Friday, October 7, 2011

The Canadian Manifesto: Chapter Three: Laying the Foundation

The Canadian Manifesto: How the American Neoconservatives Stole My Country

If we had to name one person who had the biggest impact on movement conservatism, it would have to be William F. Buckley Jr.

Before joining the cause, it was being led by cranky old men, but Buckley was able to inspire young people to become political activists.

Stephen Harper once said that the term 'Progressive Conservative', was an oxymoron.  I suppose he was right.

However, "movement conservatism" or the "new conservative", also fit that description.

While they did fight for the status quo, especially in terms of whites being supreme, and the rich maintaining their role as the ruling class, they also wanted to radically change traditional conservatism.

Most radical movements were bottom up, with the poor and downtrodden overthrowing the self serving elite class.  But this one is top down, with the elite class manipulating the poor and downtrodden to secure their positions, and not only hold on to their wealth, but add to it, often at the expense of those suffering the most.

When the Reform Party was first establishing itself as a party for the people, Stephen Harper shocked a reporter when he blurted out "It's amazing what you can get them [the members] to do once you convince them that it's the leader who is telling them".

Populism redefined.

Rebel in Reverse

In 1951, Time Magazine ran a story on William Buckley Jr., referring to him as a "rebel in reverse, a fire-eating youthful conservative". (1)  His first book, God and Man at Yale, had just been published, and was causing a few shock waves in the academic world.

Buckley accused American universities, in particular Yale, of "sabotaging God" and trying to destroy Capitalism.

"the duel between Christianity and atheism is the most important in the world . . . [and] the struggle between individualism and collectivism is the same struggle reproduced on another level." Under the "protective label of 'academic freedom,' " says he, Yale has become "one of the most extraordinary incongruities of our time: the institution that derives its moral and financial support from Christian individualists and then addresses itself to the task of persuading the sons of these supporters to be atheistic socialists." (1)
The book was hyperbolic, because at the time only 5 of the 1100 members of the Yale faculty could be defined as atheist or agnostic.  The same five who preached about the excesses of capitalism.  But it didn't matter.  As Harper's mentor Tom Flanagan once said, "It doesn't have to be true, just plausible."

The same attacks on academia by the new right, are being conducted today in Canada by Preston Manning and his centre for destroying democracy.

At Carleton University, a workshop sponsored by Manning's centre, in conjunction with the Ontario Progressive Conservative Campus Association, instructed those in attendance to take over student elections and organizations.  Documents and tapes were released on Wikileaks.
"Presenters and participants are caught on tape advocating for the creation of front groups for the Conservative Party to masquerade as non-partisan grassroots organizations, influencing the political discourse on campus, stacking student elections with Party members, and conspiring to defeat non-profit organizations because of political differences, all with the intention of hiding their affiliations to the Party in the process.  ... Sometimes you can't attach the party's name to something. You just can't. If it's a really controversial issue on campus or something that might show up in the newspaper, you want to be careful. You just have your shell organization and have the Campus Coalition for Liberty and two other Tory front groups which are front organizations, all of those groups might actually qualify for funding too," said Ryan O'Connor, a workshop facilitator and former member of the OPCCA. (2)
These activities are not confined to Ontario universities, but are taking place across the country.

In the United States, Morton Blackwell, the man who helped Preston Manning to create his school for stormtroopers, also runs a Campus Leadership Training program, promoting the same cloaked activities.  Journalist Jeff Horowitz went undercover, posing as a potential radical, and reported:
Unlike chapter-based political organizations, CLP clubs are unaffiliated with either the Leadership Institute or each other. According to Blackwell, this trait offers a serious advantage: "No purges." The clubs' independence also comes with the benefit of plausible deniability. "You can get away with stuff that you would take a lot of flak for doing in the College Republicans," says CLP director Dan Flynn. (3)
Blackwell, through another organization called Youth for Western Civilization, is also launching personal attacks on faculty members with progressive ideas.

Retired university professor Michael Yates has written extensively on the topic and says that he's glad he left academia before the worst of it:  "At least I did not have to face the nasty right-wing students who spy on their professors and do the bidding of the professional witch hunters who spew hatred on radio talk shows, and television programs."  It's a new form of McCarthyism.

Recently, two Canadian university professors, complained that they were being targeted.
Two University of Ottawa professors, vocal critics of the federal Conservative government, say they have become targets of a new political intimidation tactic, aimed at using their private, personal information against them.  Professors Errol Mendes and Amir Attaran, frequently castigated as Liberal sympathizers by the Conservatives, were notified in recent weeks of two unusually massive freedom-of-information requests at the University of Ottawa, demanding details of the professors’ employment, expenses and teaching records. (4)
All part of "movement conservatism", better defined as "radical conservatism".  How's that for an oxymoron?

The Foundation of Movement Conservatism is Money

The reason for the success of movement conservatism, is that it was always well funded.  Often dubbed the "revolt of the rich", those at the top were way at the top.  Buckley himself came from a wealthy family, who made most of their money in oil.

His equally wealthy associates sponsored a magazine of "conservative" ideas, called the National Review, where Buckley, before learning to speak in code, rallied the white folks, even promoting the use of violence if necessary, to keep blacks in their place. (5)

Eventually they took over a big chunk of the media, but their biggest success came from something they had decided on six decades ago.  They knew then that to be really successful they would have to take over one of the major political parties, and set their sights on the Republicans.


1. Education:  Rebel in Reverse, Time Magazine, October 29, 1951

2. Tory student groups hijack democracy on Ontario campuses, The Dominion, March 14, 2009 
3. My Right-wing Degree,  By Jeff Horowitz, May 24, 2005

4. Tories accused of digging up dirt on 'liberal' profs, By Susan Delacourt and Bruce Campion-Smith, Toronto Star,  February 11, 2011

5. The Conscience of a Liberal, By Paul Krugamn, W. W. Norton & Co., 2007, ISBN: 13 978-0-393-06069-0, p. 103

No comments:

Post a Comment